Legal Opinion
In Re Francis Joseph Millow
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 13, 1976No. 591, Docket 75-1381PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Circuit Judge:
Francis Joseph Millow asks us to vacate an order of the Southern District entered on October 31,1975, under whic|i he has been confined pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1826(a) for failure to answer questions before a grand jury. Millow asserts that he was entitled to withhold his testimony because the government admitted that it had obtained evidence that served as the basis for questions propounded by the grand jury through the illegal use of wiretapping. Alternatively, Millow maintains that he is excused from answering questions because the government has not fulfilled its…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Lawn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Gelbard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Leonard James and Otto SeboldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Pedro Saade, United States of America v. Carlos Zenon RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Sherrie Tuggle Apple, United States of America v. Stacy Nevin Apple, A/K/A Dr. Stachel PommeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Donald DienCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Amadio PetitoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.