Wildman v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lamar. Tried before the Hon. S. H. Spkott. Tbe appellant in this case, Tom Wilclman, was indicted, tried and convicted for selling spirituous, vinous or malt liquors without, a license. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Lamar. Tried before the Hon. S. H. Spkott. Tbe appellant in this case, Tom Wilclman, was indicted, tried and convicted for selling spirituous, vinous or malt liquors without, a license. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion. Upon the introduction of all the evidence, the defendant requested the court to give to the jury the following written charges, and separately excepted to the court’s refusal to give each of them as asked: (3.) “I charge you gentlemen of the jury, that, if you believe from tiie evidence in this case that the…
1Opinion of the Court
HARALSON, J. —
The indictment in two counts is, first, for selling spirituous, vinous or malt liquors with*128out a license; and, second, for selling, giving away or otherwise disposing of the same kind of liquors without a license. It is in the form prescribed by the Code. Forms 79 and SO, p. 835 of Criminal Code. It appears by act approved, February 18th, 1899, (Acts, 1898-99, p. 108), that such liquors are prohibited to be sold in Lamar county.
One W. J. Sandlin, a witness for the State, testified that lie, in company with W. J. Paul, went to the defendant’s house in Lamar county at night, and…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Diamond v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
- Buckhanon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
- Thompson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919