Legal Opinion

McTaggart v. Eastman's Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided April 15, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Fitzsimons, Ch. J.

The testimony clearly shows that, although the plaintiff and James Murphy were both employed by defendant, yet they were not in the same common employment; they were servants of defendant, but were not fellow servants; the defendant’s driver, Murphy, was employed by it as a driver of one of the wagons used by it in the meat business which it carried on; desiring to extend their business premises, it employed masons and hod-carriers to erect the necessary brick walls of the new addition-to its premises. Plaintiff was one of the hod-carriers so employed, and while employed in…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Erjauschek v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  2. Spillane v. Eastman's Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API