Legal Opinion

Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. Russo

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 18, 2014No. AC35354PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

In this foreclosure action, the self-represented defendant Steven Russo 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion of the plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 2 to open a judgment of foreclosure by sale and denying his motion to open that judgment. He claims that the court abused its discretion in so doing. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The relevant facts are largely undisputed. On September 15, 2003, the defendant and his wife executed a promissory note in favor of the plaintiffs predecessor in interest in the principal amount of $288,750, which was…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  2. Union Trust Co. v. Roth0Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  3. Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A. v. RussoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. HSBC Bank USA, Nat'l Ass'n v. LahrConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API