Horlick's Malted Milk Corp. v. Horlick
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, District Judge.
This action is for the alleged infringement of plaintiff’s trade-mark, brought under 15 U.S.C.A. § 81, et seq., and for unfair competition. The matter now before the court is the motion by defendants to dismiss. The motion states: “ * * * and as grounds for said motion defendants now show the court that the plaintiff’s complaint is insufficient in law for it to maintain its action in the following particulars: (1) the complaint does not allege the commission of any acts by defendants which constitute statutory infringement of plaintiff’s trade-mark; (2) the plaintiff…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- L. E. Waterman Co. v. Modern Pen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Scandinavia Belting Co. v. Asbestos & Rubber Works of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
- John B. Stetson Co. v. Stephen L. Stetson Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Turner & Seymour Mfg. Co. v. A. & J. MFG. CO.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- American Products Co. v. American Products Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. ScherperDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1942
- Local Loan Co. v. Local Finance Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1944
- Horlick's Malted Milk Corp. v. HorlickDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1943
- Fruit Growers Co-op. v. M. W. Miller & Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1947