Legal Opinion

Rozell v. Cranfill

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1908No. 6,426Published

From Hancock Circuit Court; Edward IF. Felt, Special Judge. Suit by Seth Rozell and others against Nathan Cranfill. From a. judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

Rabb, J.

Appellee earnestly insists in his petition for a rehearing that in the decision of this case the court misconceived the nature of the issues in the partition proceedings in which the appellee’s grantor’s interest in her deceased husband’s lands was set off to her in severalty, and the legal effect of the decree therein.

The complaint in that proceeding, filed by the widow, set forth as the source of her title and foundation of her right to partition the fact that Barzilla Eozell died intestate, the owner of the premises, and left his widow and the appellants…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McAdams v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Utterback v. TerhuneIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Habig v. DodgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Thorp v. HanesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Hendrix v. McBethIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API