Legal Opinion

Prosperity Co. v. St. Joe Machines, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided February 4, 1942No. Civil Action No. 150PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAYMOND, District Judge.

This case is before the court upon two motions by plaintiff and four by defendants.

Plaintiff’s first motion is for an order to compel defendants to answer questions propounded to certain witnesses upon the taking of depositions, which questions the witnesses refused to answer on advice of counsel for defendants. The witnesses were officers or employees of defendants. The questions were obviously directed to the purpose of learning who if anyone aside from the named defendants is financing or directing the defense. Aside ’from the matter of privilege, the only…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doherty Research Co. v. Universal Oil Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  2. Paraffine Cos., Inc. v. WielandDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1927
  3. Lip Lure, Inc. v. Bloomingdale Bros.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  2. Giulio Natta, Piero Pino and Georgio Mazzanti, Ex Rel. Interference 89,634 v. Alex Zletz and Standard Oil Company of IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  3. Félix A. Thillet, Inc. v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API