Cornelius Lewis and Paul S. Erickson v. Michael P. Lane
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-appellants (the “plaintiffs” or “appellants”) appeal the magistrate’s order *1166granting summary judgment for defendants-appellees (the “defendants”) as well as his order denying their motion to substitute counsel. We hold that the magistrate abused his discretion by not allowing the substitution of counsel and that plaintiffs may be able to raise genuine issues of material fact to withstand a summary judgment motion. Accordingly, we vacate the order granting summary judgment and remand with instructions that substitute counsel be appointed and be given the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Tapanga Hardeman v. David WathenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Jim E. Chandler v. James CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Nathan Gillis v. Jon E. Litscher, Gerald A. Berge, Warden, Bradley HompeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Marcos Gray v. Marcus HardyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Spencer Harris v. Ronald Fleming, Larry Frailey and Walter BreischkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.