Legal Opinion

J. J. Gavin & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 26, 1965No. 69266; protests 59/19447, etc. (New York)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The eases listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, consolidated for the purpose of trial, bring before the court the claim of plaintiffs that the classification by the collector of customs of certain machines, designated as “RAPID-d” slitting machines and the “PRACTICA” slitting machines, and assessed with duty at the rate of 13% per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 353 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, is erroneous.

It is the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keer, Maurer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Fritz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Roto Bag Machine Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Hudson-Rissman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Owens-Illinois Glass Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  2. Cottrell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Cottrell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Cottrell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  5. The Cottrell Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API