Dronca v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We reverse the decision of the Unemployment Appeals Commission, which concluded that the claimant was disqualified from receiving benefits under sections 443.036(29) and 443.101(l)(a)2., Florida Statutes (2003). The record shows that *1012the claimant’s conduct was a single incident of poor judgment, which .justified the employer’s termination of the claimant’s employment, but did not amount to misconduct sufficient to deny the claimant benefits. See Powell v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 886 So.2d 420 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); McCarty v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 878 So.2d 432, 435 (Fla.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCarty v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Ash v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Powell v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004