Simonson v. International Bank
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MacMAHON, District Judge.
Defendant International Bank makes this motion, pursuant to Rule 12(b) (2) and (3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for an order vacating service of the summons and complaint and dismissing the action on the ground that it is a foreign corporation organized under the laws of the state of Arizona and is not subject to process in this district because it is not doing business in New York.
A cross-motion by the plaintiff to take depositions to establish that defendant is amenable to process in New York was granted, and the defendant’s motion was held…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Echeverry v. Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Libbey-Owens-Ford Co. v. McDowell & Partners Pty. Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 1988