Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Holder

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 10, 2009No. 08-60020UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

At issue in this case is whether petitioner’s conviction under Florida’s false imprisonment statute, Fla. Stat. § 787.02, is an “aggravated felony” for purposes of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(a)(iii). Petitioner Christopher Charles Kerr (“petitioner”), a lawful resident alien, was served with a Notice to Appear charging him removable on grounds that he has been convicted of an aggravated felony. Overturning the initial decision of the Immigration Judge (“IJ”), the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) held that the Florida false imprisonment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Leocal v. AshcroftSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Negusie v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Rosales-BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. Marc HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. Marc HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
  4. United States v. Marc HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API