Legal Opinion

Samuel Roth v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 22, 1958No. 322, Docket 24977PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant’s criminal conviction for sending obscene matter through the mails was affirmed by this court, 237 F. 2d 796, and by the Supreme Court, 352 U.S. 964, 77 S.Ct. 361, 1 L.Ed.2d 319. Thereafter he made a motion in the district court for reduction of his five-year sentence to the time already served. Rule 35, F.R.Crim.P. This appeal is from the denial of that motion.

There is no question but that the sentence was within the allowable statutory limit. 18 U.S.C. § 1461. It is the appellant’s contention, however, that in imposing the sentence originally, and in refusing to reduce it, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  2. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Julius Rosenberg and Ethel Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. United States v. Samuel RothCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  5. Johnny Ray Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Pinto-MejiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. United States v. Pinto-MejiaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Paolo Lo DucaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  4. von Bulow ex rel. Auersperg v. von BulowDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  5. United States v. Meyer SohnenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API