Legal Opinion

Attorney-General ex rel. Smith v. Petty

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 11, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On information in the nature of quo warranto. Demurrer to plea.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gummere, Citiee Justice.

This information is filed under the revised Quo Warranto act of 1903 (Pamph. L., p. 375), for the purpose of having it judicially determined whether the relator or the respondent is legally entitled to hold the office of mayor of the borough of Washington. It is averred in the information and admitted by the plea that the relator was duly elected to the office at the general election held in November last, and that the respondent, who was then the incumbent of the office, and who was a candidate for re-election, was defeated at…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ludlam v. DallasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API