Legal Opinion

Grand River Gravel Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided April 8, 1931No. Docket No. 23085Published

1. Depreciation of petitioner's plant and operating equipment should be computed on a unit-of-production basis. 2. Depletion of a gravel deposit based on discovery value is disallowed. Parker Gravel Co.,21 B.T.A. 51, followed.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAND RIVER GRAVEL COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Grand River Gravel Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 23085.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

22 B.T.A. 1124; 1931 BTA LEXIS 2015;

April 8, 1931, Promulgated

1. Depreciation of petitioner's plant and operating equipment should be computed on a unit-of-production basis.

2. Depletion of a gravel deposit based on discovery value is disallowed. Parker Gravel Co.,21 B.T.A. 51, followed.

E. M. Connor, Esq., for the petitioner.

P. M. Clark, Esq., for the respondent.

LANSDON

The respondent has asserted a deficiency in income…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parker Gravel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  2. Grand River Gravel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API