Blanchard's Widow v. Blanchard
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PROBATES FOR THE PARISH OF ASSUMPTION. The district attorney for the second judicial district of this state, filed on the 4th April, 1833, a motion wherein he informed the court that certain property of the defendants, seized by the coroner on a writ of fieri facias, issued in this case, is the only property known, belonging to them.
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PROBATES FOR THE PARISH OF ASSUMPTION. The district attorney for the second judicial district of this state, filed on the 4th April, 1833, a motion wherein he informed the court that certain property of the defendants, seized by the coroner on a writ of fieri facias, issued in this case, is the only property known, belonging to them. That the property so seized, is subject to a legal mortgage in favor of the state, for the amount of the collection bond for the state taxes, executed by one of the defendants in 1831, in his capacity as collector of said taxes, for the…
1Opinion of the CourtBullard, J.
The plaintiffs having recovered a judgment in the Court of Probates, against F. Blanchard, on his bond as administrator of their ancestor, caused an execution to be levied on a plantation and slaves, and other property of the defendant, which had at the inception of the suit been attached, the defendant being represented as an absconding debtor. The administration bond was given in 1827.
After this fieri facias had been levied, an. execution issued by the state treasurer, against the same defendant, as collector of state taxes for the year 1830, and against his sureties, came into the hands of…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Chavez v. McKnightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1857