Legal Opinion
525 Park Avenue Associates v. De Hoyas
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of that court (121 AD2d 908). Moreover, we hold that the filing of a Rent Stabilization Code § 54 (D) application does not preserve a landlord’s right to refuse a renewal of a lease on nonprimary residence grounds, pursuant to section 54 (E) where no notice of such intent has been timely given (see, Golub v Frank, 65 NY2d 900; compare, Crow v 83rd St. Assoc., 68 NY2d 796 [Omnibus Housing Act (L 1983, ch 403) did not implicitly repeal the Golub notice…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- MATTER OF 61 JANE ST. ASSOCS. v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Crow v. 83rd Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kips Bay Towers Associates v. YuceogluAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Schachter v. Tolassi (In Re 105 East Second Street Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Handy v. RenzulliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Handy v. RenzulliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988