Beyer v. Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
We affirm the district court. Countrywide’s inclusion of the expedited payoff service fee in the loan payoff demand statement was not deceptive within the meaning of the Washington Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”), Rev.Code. Wash. § 19.86.010, et seq., because the payoff demand statement twice unambiguously disclosed that payment of the payoff service fee was not required to release the mortgage lien. Cf. Dwyer v. J.I. Kislak Mortgage Corp., 103 Wash.App. 542, 13 P.3d 240, 243 (2000).
The expedited payoff service was voluntary and extraneous to the mortgage. Beyer nowhere alleged…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- John Doe v. United States of America, in Re John Doe, Debtor. John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Scott v. Cingular WirelessWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Lowden v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.