Broderick v. Archibald
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Camille E. Archibald, third party, from an order of the City Court of Yonkers, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 18th day of January, 1901, denying a motion for a modification of an order directing the said Camille E. Archibald to pay $150 to the receiver of the property of the judgment debtor, Merritt L. Archibald, by striking therefrom the provision directing such payment. ,
1Opinion of the Court
Hibschbebg, J.:
The record contains no testimony but that of Camille E. Archibald, the appellant, who was examined as a witness in supplementary proceedings against the judgment debtor, who is her husband, and also as a third party. She testified to payments made to her by him prior to the recovery of the plaintiff’s judgment in discharge of certain indebtedness. She further testified that she had also received from him prior to such recovery' the sum of $150. This she stated was paid to her as. wages at the rate of $5 per week for thirty weeks from January 1, 1900, during which time she was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Krone v. KlotzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Conger v. CoreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
3Cited by1 opinion
- Holmes v. O'ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902