Legal Opinion

City of Akron v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 31, 1943No. 9374Published

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

This litigation stems from the liquidation of The Commercial Bank and Trust Company of Akron, Ohio, in which the appellant, City of Akron, had deposited public funds, which, pursuant to the statutes of Ohio and the city ordinances, were protected by certain depository bonds executed and delivered by seven surety companies, including the appellee, Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York. The bank deposits of the City had been further protected by collateral security, consisting of real estate mortgages and municipal bonds. Upon the failure of the Bank, the City of Akron…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Merrill v. National Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Chemical Nat. Bank v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
  4. City of Oakwood v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  5. Oakwood city v. FultonOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API