Legal Opinion

United States v. Homan

District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 27, 1977No. 77-315-CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, District Judge.

The above-named movant was convicted by a jury of entering The City Bank at Muskogee, Oklahoma, which bank was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation with an intent to commit therein a felony, namely, the taking of money belonging to the bank, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). After his conviction he perfected an appeal which raised three points:

1. A misnaming of the bank in the Indictment resulting in a variance in the Indictment and evidence adduced at trial, the evidence showing that the correct name of the bank was “City Bank” and not “City…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Westfall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. James Richard Ellis v. State of Oklahoma and Warden Ray H. PageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  3. Bernard Herman Frand v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Larry G. Linebarger v. State of Oklahoma and Ray H. Page, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  5. Weldon Kelley Lorraine v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hatch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. United States v. Roger Dale CountsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API