Bassler v. Niesly
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
In Error. THIS was an ejectment for lands in Dauphin county^ It came before this Court on an exception to the charge of the President of the' Court of Common Pleas. The exception was taken under the act of assembly, and no facts appeared on the record except such as were stated or alluded to in the charge.
Read the full summary
In Error. THIS was an ejectment for lands in Dauphin county^ It came before this Court on an exception to the charge of the President of the' Court of Common Pleas. The exception was taken under the act of assembly, and no facts appeared on the record except such as were stated or alluded to in the charge. The ejectment was brought by the defendants in error, children of Martin Niesly deceased, founded on a parol contract between the said Martin and his father Jacob Niesly, for the purchase of the land in dispute, which contract, as the plaintiff alleged, was áccompanied with payment of part…
1Opinion of the Court
Tilghman C. J.
This case comes before us on an exception to the charge of the President of the Court of Common ■Pleas. The exception is taken under the act of assembly, and no facts appear on the record except such as are stated or alluded to in the charge. The ejectment was brought by the defendants in error, children of Martin Niesly, deceased, founded on a parol contract between the said Martin and his father Jacob Niesly, for the purchase of the land in ■dispute : which contract, as the plaintiff alleged, was accompanied with payment of part of the purchase money, and delivery of…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Gibblehouse v. StongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832
- Gregg v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
- Brown v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1836
- Galbraith v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1824