Legal Opinion
Oahe Conservancy Sub-District v. Alexander
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided July 25, 1980No. 78-1006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DONALD J. PORTER, District Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Plaintiffs brought this action for injunctive and declaratory relief relating to defendants’ operation of the Jamestown and Pipestem dams in North Dakota. Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction was denied by the Court in Oahe Conservancy Sub-District v. Alexander, 452 F.Supp. 714 (D.S.D.1978). The action was tried on the merits June 9, 10 and 11, 1980. The Court now concludes that it must reject plaintiffs’ claim that defendants have in any way operated the dams in violation of law. The Court also overrules plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Greene v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Arlington Coalition on Transportation v. John A. Volpe, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Hurley v. KincaidSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Story v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Oglala Sioux Tribe of Pine Ridge Indian Reservation v. HallettDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1982
- James River Flood Control Ass'n v. WattDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1982
- Nos. 83-1643, 83-1644Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- OGLALA SIOUX TRIBE OF PINE RIDGE, ETC. v. HallettDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1982