Legal Opinion

Linville v. Clark

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1908No. 1725PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court 6f the Second Judicial District of the State of Nevada, Washoe County; B. F. Curler, Judge. Action by R. W. Linville against A. J. Clark. From the judgment, defendant appeals. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Talbot, C. J.:

About two and one-half months before the day set for the hearing a stipulation was filed allowing the appellant thirty days additional in which to file his opening brief, if his time for that purpose had not already expired. No one appeared on the part of the appellant at the hearing, and no brief was filed on his behalf until more than a month after the hearing, when, without any stipulation or order authorizing it, one was filed setting up a question to which no exception had been taken in the trial court, and regarding which no assignment of error had been made.

Un…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gardner v. GardnerNevada Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State v. MyattNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Reinhart v. HardestyNevada Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Mathewson v. BoyleNevada Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Pacific Power Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Potosi Zinc Co. v. MahoneyNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Arnold v. Florence Goldfield Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API