Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tamara Ernster v. City of Mt. Washington, Kentucky, et al.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided May 4, 2026No. 3:23-cv-00305Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-CV-00305-GNS-CHL TAMARA ERNSTER PLAINTIFF v. CITY OF MT. WASHINGTON, KENTUCKY, et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine (DN 51) and Defendants’ Motions in Limine (DN 50). These motions are ripe for adjudication. I. BACKGROUND When Plaintiff Tamara Ernster (“Ernster”) sought medical care for an allergic reaction, she was detained by police due to concerns about her mental health. (Am. Compl. ¶ 49, DN 6; see Mem. Op. & Order,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. John Ray Bonds (91-3610) Mark Verdi (91-3609) and Steven Wayne Yee (91-3608)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API