Canady v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SILBERMAN, Judge.
David Canady appeals his judgment and sentence for armed robbery with a firearm, grand theft of a motor vehicle, and giving a false name to a law enforcement officer. Because the State failed to prove the necessary elements to support a conviction for grand theft of a motor vehicle, we vacate the judgment and sentence for that offense.
The evidence presented at trial reflects that Canady was a passenger in a car that had been stolen. The evidence was insufficient to prove his criminal intent to deprive another person of property, or to appropriate the property, as required…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- I.T. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- A.J.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Schlangen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marlene Jaggernauth v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Miguel Angel Alfonso-Roche v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- United States v. Cesar Medina-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- A.D.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- A.D.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.