Legal Opinion

Canady v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 13, 2002No. 2D00-2942PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILBERMAN, Judge.

David Canady appeals his judgment and sentence for armed robbery with a firearm, grand theft of a motor vehicle, and giving a false name to a law enforcement officer. Because the State failed to prove the necessary elements to support a conviction for grand theft of a motor vehicle, we vacate the judgment and sentence for that offense.

The evidence presented at trial reflects that Canady was a passenger in a car that had been stolen. The evidence was insufficient to prove his criminal intent to deprive another person of property, or to appropriate the property, as required…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. I.T. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
  2. A.J.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Schlangen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Marlene Jaggernauth v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Miguel Angel Alfonso-Roche v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. United States v. Cesar Medina-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. A.D.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  5. A.D.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API