Legal Opinion

People v. De La Paz

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1965No. Crim. 10584PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.

Defendant was charged with a violation of subdivision 2 of section 487 of the Penal Code (grand theft from the person). Four prior convictions, three of which were for the same offense, were charged and admitted. After a trial by jury, he was found guilty, probation was denied and he was sentenced to state prison.

Officer O’Lear, of the Los Angeles Police Department, was assigned to the bunko pickpocketing detail. He was well acquainted with defendant and had arrested him on at least one previous occasion. On August 8, 1964, the officer was off duty. He saw defendant standing at a bus stop on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. PeeteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. PikeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. PerrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. KnightonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. People v. PerrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API