Legal Opinion

United States v. Dario Dicesare, United States of America v. Kathleen Flannery, United States of America v. Jose Marin

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 10, 1985No. 84-5013, 84-5021 and 84-5056PublishedCited by 115 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Circuit Judge:

DiCesare and Flannery appeal their convictions entered after conditional guilty pleas under rule 11(a)(2), Fed.R.Crim.P. Marin appeals his conviction after a jury trial. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm DiCesare’s conviction, but vacate Flannery’s conviction and remand for an evidentiary hearing. We vacate Marin’s conviction and remand for a new trial.

I

In January 1983, the government began investigating DiCesare after he and his wife insisted on depositing large amounts of cash in the First Los Angeles bank without filing the currency transaction…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Osvaldo Rodriguez-MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Gregory LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Crystal Mason, Edward YoungCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API