Legal Opinion
Cordero v. Corbisiero
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 1992PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by annulling so much of respondent’s determination as directed that the penalty be served during Saratoga racing days, and the matter should be remitted to respondent Board for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.
As framed by the parties, the controlling question in this case is whether respondent’s so-called "Saratoga policy”— which requires that, following an administrative appeal, a suspension imposed for an infraction committed at the Sara-toga racetrack be served at…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- MATTER OF ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF ALBANY v. New York State Dep't of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
3Cited by23 opinions
- MTR SCHWARTFIGURE v. HartnettNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- New York City Transit Authority v. New York State Department of LaborNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Alca Industries, Inc. v. DelaneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Elcor Health Services, Inc. v. NovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- SLS Residential, Inc. v. New York State Office of Mental HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.