Legal Opinion
Lone Star Security & Video, Inc. v. Bureau of Security & Investigative Services
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 2009No. B208944PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, Acting P. J.
Appellant Bruce Boyer (Boyer) appeals from the judgment denying his petition for writ of mandate challenging a decision by the Department of Consumer Affairs, Bureau of Security and Investigative Services (the bureau), to revoke his license as an alarm company qualified manager. Boyer contends (1) his license could not properly be revoked based solely on Business and Professions Code section 490, and (2) the decision to revoke was based on irrelevant evidence and additional relevant evidence was improperly excluded. We affirm.
FACTS
Boyer and Lone Star are licensed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- McClung v. Employment Development DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Fire Insurance Exchange v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Brokopp v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- Golde v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ctr. for Cmty. Action & Envtl. Justice v. City of Moreno Valley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Margarito v. State Athletic CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Yako William Collins v. State of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 2025
- Center for Community Action etc. v. City of Moreno ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.