Ives v. Norris
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Dodge county, where the cause had been brought from the county court, and its judgment affirmed by Post, J. . against title to the act, cited Cooley Const. Lim., 148. Stale, ex rel. Jones, v. Lancaster County, 6.Neb., 474. 3 West Ya., 5,88. 20 Ind., 490. in favor of constitutionality of the law, cited Cooley Const. Lim. (2d Ed.), 143, 144. Bonorden v. Kriz, ante p. 121.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
1. This action was commenced in the county court of Dodge county by the defendant in error against the plaintiff to recover the value of a grade Durham bull belonging to the defendant, which bull it is alleged was castrated by *253the plaintiff. The case was tided to a jury in the county court, and verdict and judgment were given for the defend-, ant in error. The case was taken on error to the district court, where the judgment of the county court was affirmed..
The action is brought under the provisions of an act entitled “An act regulating the herding and driving of stock,”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
- Weaver v. LapsleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1869
- State ex rel. Stuart v. KinsellaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
3Cited by16 opinions
- Van Horn v. State ex rel. AbbottNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- State ex rel. Graham v. TibbetsNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Johnson v. Grady CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Moeller, McPherrin & Judd v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- Lincoln Land Co. v. Village of GrantNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.