American Farmers Insurance Co. of Phoenix v. Thomason

On the record before us, I think the case should be affirmed for the reason that appellant entered its appearance and thereby recognized the jurisdiction of the court over it for all purposes.

Appellant filed “MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND TO REQUIRE PLAINTIFF TO SPECIFICALLY ALLEGE MATTERS THERETO RELATED.”

In this motion, appellant, after alleging that it was entering its appearance for the sole purpose of quashing service of summons, then asked the court to require appellee to allege specifically “Whether the defendant (appellant) is a foreign or a domestic corporation, etc.”

In thus…