Dorman v. Venetian Casino Resort

because NRS 18.130(1) stays the action until security is posted. The Venetian responds that dismissal under NRS 18.130(4) is permissible and appropriate because Dorman missed the deadline by 14 months, did not request an enlargement of time, and NRS 18.130(4) does not prohibit a motion to dismiss after a plaintiff posts his security. The Venetian also argues that NRS 18.130(1) should not toll Dorman's obligations under NRCP 16.1 because it is Dorman's actions that release the NRS 18.130(1) stay. Regarding NRS 18.130(4), this court "give[s] effect to the statute's plain meaning . . . when the…