Legal Opinion
Proodian v. Plymouth Citrus Growers Assoc.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided March 30, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, J. :
This is an appeal by appellant (plaintiff) from an adverse judgment wherein she sought to collect the proeeéds of certain retain certificates from appellee. We had another phase of this case before us in Proodian v. Plymouth Citrus Growers Ass’n., 149 Fla. 507, 6 So. (2nd) 531.
The record reveals that appelle is a non-profit corporation and is a cooperative citrus marketing agency. Its members are elected upon application and when so elected are subject to the conditions in the association’s by-laws. It was the practice of appellee to estimate the cost of handling its members’ fruit…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Love v. Brown Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Florida Citrus Exchange v. GrishamSupreme Court of Florida · 1913
- Proodian v. Plymouth Citrus Growers AssociationSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Le Roy Dyal Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Michael Costello v. Barry LipsitzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Gottfried, Inc. v. Paulette Koch Real EstateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- CQ Farms, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- C.A. Hansen Corp. v. Aetna Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984