State v. Duncan
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, J.
Appellant contends that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that certain statements made by the victim to her mother, concerning the sexual conduct of the appellee, were inadmissible because they lacked the essential attributes of spontaneity.
The record discloses that near the hour of 11:00 A. M., on Saturday, March 8, 1975, the victim was at home in her bedroom, watching television, while her infant sister slept in a crib nearby. The girl’s stepfather, appellee herein, was absent from the home when the victim’s mother went out to a laundromat. Shortly thereafter, according to the victim,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beausoliel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Soto v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1908
- Hill v. SkinnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1947
- State v. McFallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by101 opinions
- State v. BostonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. DeverOhio Supreme Court · 1992
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.