Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Shull

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1898PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Mineral County. Trespass on the case, by A. F. Schwartz against L. E. Shull and others. There was a judgment for plaintiff and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Dent, Judge:

An action of trespass on the case, instituted by A. F. Schwartz against L. E. Shull and others, resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff for the sum of one thousand two hundred dollars. Defendant Shull appeals, and relies on the following assignment of errors: ‘‘First. Overruling petitioner’s demurrer to the plaintiff’s amended declai'ation. Second. Refusing to give petitioner’s instruction A, as set out in bill of exception No. 1. Third. Giving the three instructions, and each of them,.at the instance of the plaintiff, as set out in bill of exception No. 2. Fourth. Refusing to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bertha Zinc Co. v. Martin's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  2. Foley v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Long v. City of WeirtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hartley v. CredeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Hartley v. CredeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Matthews v. Cumberland & Allegheny Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Puffer v. Hub Cigar Store, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API