Legal Opinion

Harley v. Harley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 8, 1961No. 21308PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Presiding Justice.

Under the facts of this case, the discharge of the resident defendant did not divest the court of jurisdiction of the two nonresident defendants, since the nonresident defendants waived the right to object to venue when, after the discharge of the resident defendant, they filed an .additional pleading to the merits. Hudgins Contracting Co. v. Redmond, 178 Ga. 317 (173 SE 135); Burger v. Noble, 81 Ga. App. 759 (59 SE2d 761); 92 C.J.S. 820-822, § 124; 56 Am Jur. 44, '§ 40. Therefore the trial court properly overruled the nonresident' defendants’ later motion to strike,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hudgins Contracting Co. v. RedmondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Burger v. NobleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. VANGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  2. Morris v. Cunningham (In Re Cunningham)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API