Legal Opinion

Greff v. Havens

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1947PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGavagan, J.

Motion for order directing entry of judgment under section 1171-b of the Civil Practice Act.

Prior to the 1940 amendment of section 1169 of the Civil Practice Act (L, 1940, ch. 226), no counsel fees were allowable, against parties other than the husband, in an action brought by such parties to annul the marriage after the death of the husband. The wife was “ not a privileged suitor against them, but only against her husband while he lived,” (Farnham v. Farnham, 227 N. Y. 155, 158.) In 1940 section 1169 of the Civil Practice Act was amended to read, in part, as follows; “ When an action for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Farnham v. . FarnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Weber v. WeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Weingarten v. WeingartenNew York Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deepdale Gardens Third Corp. v. BechkyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API