Legal Opinion
In Re Bryan
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 1936No. File No. Cr. 128PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
The petitioners were convicted of operating taxi cabs upon the streets of the city of Bismarck without having first obtained a license therefor under the provisions of ordinance No. 447 of said city. They were sentenced to jail and now apply to this court for a writ of habeas corpus upon the ground that they are unlawfully and illegally imprisoned because the ordinance in question is unconstitutional and therefore void. By chapter 175, Session Laws, North Dakota, 1933, the state granted to cities the power “to license and regulate the operation of taxicabs, and fix their charges for services…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hodge Drive-It-Yourself Co. v. CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Huston v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Hadfield v. LundinWashington Supreme Court · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Bryan v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- Johnson v. ElkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Wiseman v. Oklahoma Board of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Wiseman v. Oklahoma Board of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980