Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Wood

New York Court of Chancery

Decided July 8, 1833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This was a question of practice. A witness, who was giving his testimony before an examiner, was advised by counsel that he need not answer a particular question which was put. The relevancy of it was left to the court; and the Vice-Chancellor, in the course of his opinion, made the following remarks:

The counsel of the parties have ho right to interrupt the examination, by advising a witness that he is not bound to answer the question. If such question be deemed improper or irrelevant, the counsel should state his objection to the examiner ; and not undertake, in the first instance, to advise…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re RussellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
  2. Burnett v. PhalonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1860
  3. Dorendinger v. TschechtelinNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1883
  4. In re LewisUnited States District Court · 1869

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API