Taylor v. Wood
New York Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
This was a question of practice. A witness, who was giving his testimony before an examiner, was advised by counsel that he need not answer a particular question which was put. The relevancy of it was left to the court; and the Vice-Chancellor, in the course of his opinion, made the following remarks:
The counsel of the parties have ho right to interrupt the examination, by advising a witness that he is not bound to answer the question. If such question be deemed improper or irrelevant, the counsel should state his objection to the examiner ; and not undertake, in the first instance, to advise…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re RussellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- Burnett v. PhalonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1860
- Dorendinger v. TschechtelinNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1883
- In re LewisUnited States District Court · 1869