Legal Opinion

Pinder v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 14, 1992No. 91-639PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals the upward departure sentence entered on his convictions for armed burglary, aggravated assault and aggravated battery. We affirm.

The trial court’s written reason for exceeding the sentencing guidelines range was that after committing the crimes, the defendant returned to the scene whereupon he threatened and shot at the victims because they had contacted the police. Defendant claims that the reason given was legally insufficient on two grounds.

First, defendant claims that threats are an essential element of the crimes of which the defendant was convicted. However, a cursory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chestnut v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  4. Dixon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  5. Rodriguez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pinder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  2. Pinder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API