Legal Opinion

Camuro v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 9, 2023No. 3:20-cv-00969Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMANDA C., Case No.: 20-CV-00969-DEB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES 14 KILILO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. [DKT. NO. 32] 16 17 18 19 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Motion for Attorney Fees (“Motion”) 20 pursuant to Social Security Act § 206(b)(1) and 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Dkt. No. 32. For the 21 reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the Motion. 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 Plaintiff Amanda C. filed this action seeking…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Crawford v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Chapa v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API