Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hintz v. Jackson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1924Published

1Dissent

Bronson, Ch. J.

(dissenting). The complaint in this action alleges the former existence between the parties of a partnership; the dissolution of this partnership; the mutual agreement that either of the co-partners could collect debts due the firm. Further, that plaintiff had collected debts and sold assets of the firm; that defendant had collected large sums of money due the firm and had applied the same to his own use; that, further, the partners agreed that if the amount of the debts due the firm, when collected and applied, should not be sufficient to pay their indebtedness then each of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Prondzinski v. GarbuttNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Lay v. EmeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Zimmerman v. LehrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Devore v. WoodruffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API