Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adrian Tabin Corp. v. Climax Boutique, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 15, 1974Published

1Dissent

Gabrielli, J. (dissenting).

The question presented is whether subdivision (3) of section 6-104 of the Uniform Commercial Code has obviated the rule established by case law in New York that the buyer of a going, business in a bulk sale transaction must make adequate inquiry concerning the seller ’s undisclosed creditors or be subject to the claims of those creditors. We conclude that such an inquiry is required to be made.

On January 9, 1970, L. D. J. Dress, Inc. sold its dress shop to one Warman who, in turn, sold it to defendant, Climax Boutique, Inc., as a going business in a bulk sales…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carl Ahlers, Inc. v. DingottNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Heilmann v. PowelsonNew York Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Marcus v. KnitzerNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Willner Butter & Egg Corp. v. RothNew York Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API