New Orleans Campaign For A Living Wage v. City of New Orleans
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Per curiam
The application is granted. The execution of the trial court’s judgment declaring La. R.S. 23:642 unconstitutional and declaring Ordinance No. 20376, the Increased Minimum Wage Charter Amendment, to be valid is stayed pending further orders of this court. This court almost invariably grants such a stay in cases in which a single judge has declared a law or ordinance unconstitutional. Manuel v. State, 95-2156 (La.8/24/95), 695 So.2d 953; St. Charles Gaming Co. v. River Boat Gaming Commission, 645 So.2d 208 (La.1994); State v. Peart, 594 So.2d 1309 (La.1992); see Bowen v. Kendrick, 483 U.S.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowen v. KendrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- St. Charles Gaming Co.. Inc. v. River Boat Gaming Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Manuel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- State v. PeartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
3Cited by1 opinion
- CAMPAIGN FOR a LIVING WAGE v. New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002