Legal Opinion

New Orleans Campaign For A Living Wage v. City of New Orleans

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 12, 2002No. 2002-CD-0995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The application is granted. The execution of the trial court’s judgment declaring La. R.S. 23:642 unconstitutional and declaring Ordinance No. 20376, the Increased Minimum Wage Charter Amendment, to be valid is stayed pending further orders of this court. This court almost invariably grants such a stay in cases in which a single judge has declared a law or ordinance unconstitutional. Manuel v. State, 95-2156 (La.8/24/95), 695 So.2d 953; St. Charles Gaming Co. v. River Boat Gaming Commission, 645 So.2d 208 (La.1994); State v. Peart, 594 So.2d 1309 (La.1992); see Bowen v. Kendrick, 483 U.S.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowen v. KendrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. St. Charles Gaming Co.. Inc. v. River Boat Gaming Com'nSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Manuel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. State v. PeartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. CAMPAIGN FOR a LIVING WAGE v. New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API