Legal Opinion
U'dreka Andrews v. State of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided May 17, 2018No. SC17-1034PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPolston, J.
In this review of the First District Court of Appeal's decision in Andrews v. State , 218 So.3d 466 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), we consider whether indigent defendants represented by pro bono counsel should be treated the same as defendants represented by private counsel or public defenders, both of whom do not have to reveal details about their hiring of experts to the prosecution. Specifically, the First District certified the following question:
WHETHER AN INDIGENT DEFENDANT WHO IS REPRESENTED BY PRIVATE COUNSEL PRO BONO IS ENTITLED TO FILE MOTIONS PERTAINING TO THE APPOINTMENT AND COSTS OF…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Carzell Moore v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- San Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People of Guam v. Eric Juan Palacios QuituguaSupreme Court of Guam · 2021
- Margo Dettelbach v. Department of Business and Professional RegulationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- NIKOLAS CRUZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Ralph Monroe v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- The Justice Administrative Commission v. Khurrum Wahid, Esq.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024