Philadelphia v. Tripple
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 61, Jan. T., 1910, by defendants, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Dec. Term, 1903, No. 803, dismissing exceptions to report of referee in case of Philadelphia to use of John McMenamy v. William Y. Tripple, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of George C. Dietrich, substituted defendant for George C. Dietrich and J. Hampton Moore, Receiver of City Trust, Safe Deposit & Surety Company of Philadelphia, substituted defendant for said City Trust Safe Deposit &…
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 61, Jan. T., 1910, by defendants, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., Dec. Term, 1903, No. 803, dismissing exceptions to report of referee in case of Philadelphia to use of John McMenamy v. William Y. Tripple, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of George C. Dietrich, substituted defendant for George C. Dietrich and J. Hampton Moore, Receiver of City Trust, Safe Deposit & Surety Company of Philadelphia, substituted defendant for said City Trust Safe Deposit & Surety Company. ■Exceptions to report of George Wharton Pepper Esq., referee. The referee’s report was substantially as…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the report of the learned referee.
2Cited by14 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Susi Contracting Co. v. Zara Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Witten v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Kass v. ToddMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Joseph Scaduto v. Anthony J. Orlando, D/B/A A. J. Orlando Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Pressy v. McCornackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.