Legal Opinion
Martin v. Giamanco
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided August 15, 2022No. 2:19-cv-02020Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ) CADE MILLER and COLE MILLER, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) ) v. ) No. 2-19-cv-02020-SHM-atc ) DONALD A. GIAMANCO, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ORDER GRANTING AFFINITY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT This is an insurance case. The Court has dismissed Defendant Donald A. Giamanco. (ECF No. 69.) Now before the Court is Defendant Nationwide Affinity Insurance Company of America’s (“Affinity”)1 Motion for Summary Judgment (the “Motion”). (ECF Nos. 85; 86.) Plaintiffs Cole Miller and Cade Miller (the “Millers”) have filed a Response.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Chappell v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Chester-O'Donley & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.