Legal Opinion

State v. Franklin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 18, 2012No. COA12-412PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

After his motion to suppress was denied, defendant pled guilty to various drug-related charges. Defendant appeals, and for the following reasons, we affirm.

I. Background

On 28 February 2011, defendant was indicted for trafficking in drugs, possession with intent to sell or deliver a controlled substance, and conspiracy to traffic in drugs. On 8 July 2011, defendant filed a motion “to suppress any and all physical evidence seized from” him “and to suppress any statements or other evidence which was obtainedf.]” On 7 November 2011, the trial court held a hearing regarding…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. State v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. State v. HornerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  2. State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  3. State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. KilletteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. VazquezCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API