Legal Opinion

Jose M. Francisco, P.A. v. Espinosa

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 18, 2007No. 06-1284Published

1Per curiam

Jose M. Francisco, P.A. (“the P.A.”) was retained by Jorge L. Espinosa on September 15, 2004, to represent Espinosa in a worker’s compensation case. Nine months later Espinosa discharged the P.A. as his counsel and retained ' successor counsel. The P.A. filed a charging and retaining lien in the worker’s compensation action. Four months later successor counsel settled the worker’s compensation case. As part of the settlement, the insurance carrier agreed to indemnify Espinosa regarding the P.A.’s claim for attorney’s fees.

The P.A. filed a complaint against Espi-nosa in the circuit court for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McFadden v. Hardrives Const., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. TRANSPORTATION CAS. INS. CO. v. FeldmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API